🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."